Evangeline Holland

Sweeping Drama ⚜ Larger than Life History ⚜ Exquisite Romance ⚜ Diverse Perspectives
May 23rd, 2016

Pistols and Petticoats: How Women Write the West

The myth of the frontier or the border, as perpetrated by male writers, has centered on the loner, the “fugitive from civilization,” (Smith 54) whose role is to clear the path for settlers and be the bridge between savage and civilization, yet whose synthesis with the wilderness bars him from the possibilities of a domestic life. Of the texts read in class, Louis L’Amour’s Hondo comes the closest to integrating the “Natty Bumppo/Leatherstocking/Hawkeye” archetype back into civilized society, and is also the most “feminine” of texts. Through the character of Hondo, one can see the germination of the work done by women writers of the West, who use the frontier setting and its accompanying myths in a uniquely feminine literary form.

According to statistics listed on the website for Romance Writers of America (RWA), the romance genre is a one billion dollar-a-year industry that makes up thirteen percent of adult fiction sold. It is a complex genre made up of multiple subgenres, ranging from Christian/Inspirational to contemporary to paranormal to erotic to suspense to historical to LGBT, and inside of each subgenre exists categories (and many combine subgenres or categories). Westerns are primarily considered to be a category of historical romance. Written primarily by women (the only known deviation from this is Howard Lowery, who writes Western romances under the genre neutral pseudonym Leigh Greenwood), this category of historical romance more explicitly focuses on the taming of the West alongside the “Hawkeye” character—and many flip this narrative, with the female protagonist as “Hawkeye,” or both male and female protagonists as “Hawkeyes.”

Overall, in the romance genre, the heroine is the hero. The West remains a masculine space in romance novels, with the archetypical stock characters and plots seen in male-written Western media, but the heroine drives the novel; she “is the one with choices to make, she is the one to take control, to triumph at the end,” states best-selling author Penelope Williamson in Dangerous Men and Adventurous Women: Romance Writers on the Appeal of the Romance. (Williamson 126) Williamson grants her heroines “the traits and qualities traditionally reserved for the heroes in other types of fiction: honor, loyalty, integrity, courage, intelligence, and good old-fashioned grit…she is a survivor.” (Williamson 128) These elements, and the woman writer’s view of the West as a uniquely hybridized space—feminine and masculine, “savage” and civilized/domestic—are present in the three Western romance texts discussed in this paper: Jezebel by Katherine Sutcliffe (1997), Fair Is the Rose by Meagan McKinney (1993), and Fall From Grace by Megan Chance (1997).

As is common with the genre, all three novels take place within the decade after the Civil War—1870 Texas, 1875 Wyoming, and 1876 Texas/Mexico respectively—, a period before the so-called closing of the west, or end of the frontier, as Frederick Jackson Turner and Buffalo Bill’s individual narratives at the turn-of-the-century claimed. Sutcliffe’s Jezebel conceptualizes the West as a hell on earth, an area where white Americans reside to escape the laws of civilization and society, and where they can only remake and refashion the land and the people through violence.

The male protagonist, Rafael de Bastistas, is referred to throughout the novel as a walking dead man; his narrative directly mirrors that of William Blake in Jim Jarmusch’s Dead Man in that an unexpected encounter with violence turns a meek farmer into “Hawkeye” or “Hondo.” The female protagonist, Charity Bell, has been brutalized by the West and her attempts to tame it. When the story opens, she is widowed, pregnant, and on the verge of insanity.

The initial meeting of Rafe and Charity echoes Hondo’s meeting with Angie Lowe and Johnny: Rafe delivers the delirious Charity’s son when he takes shelter from a snowstorm in her house, and is diverted from his quest for revenge when he is forced to care for the newborn. In this opening, both the landscape—the snowstorm—and civilization—a helpless newborn baby—conspire to force the protagonists to merge both elements in order to survive on the frontier.

In contrast, gender roles in McKinney’s Fair Is the Rose are flipped. Christabel (Christal) Van Alan escapes West after breaking free of the insane asylum to which she’d been wrongly committed, and her stagecoach is held up by a ruthless gang of ex-Confederates turned outlaws. Initially, the male protagonist, Macaulay Cain, is presented as a cold-blooded outlaw, but he is eventually revealed to be a U.S. Marshal. Civilization has brutalized Christal, and where Cain yearns to leave the West behind, she finds her own form of justice in the frontier. McKinney also presents a more multicultural and multi-ethnic West than Sutcliffe, as well as other texts read in class: not only ex-Confederates and ex-Union soldiers (with an on page appearance of Ulysses S. Grant), but African-Americans and Native Americans, exist in her concept of the frontier.

Chance presents the most violent West in Fall From Grace, and the romance that most explicitly falls in line with Williamson’s argument of the romance heroine as hero. Lily Tremaine is orphaned by an outlaw gang, who adopt her and mold her into a ruthless, sexless killer. The gang leader’s son, Christian “Texas” Sharpe, later marries her. There is something ironic in Chance’s narrative that Texas, a fellow gunslinger, attempts to tame Lily through such a civilized concept as marriage, and that it is Texas’s sheltered half-sister, Jocelyn, who is the key element in bringing Lily out of the frontier—bodily and mentally. At the same time, Jocelyn undergoes a transformation when her desire to experience the frontier as Lily has, draws her away from domesticity. In the end, Lily is akin to the Uncas character, while Jocelyn has become a “white Indian” through her experiences in the West.

In the Western romance, as presented by female writers for a primarily female audience, the frontier myth is strong, particularly Turner’s thesis that the West was “‘free land’ into which the pioneers moved [and] was available for the taking, and that American progress began with a regenerative retreat to the primitive, followed by a recapitulation of the stages of civilization.” (White) All three novels end in some degree on a farm, with little interrogation as to how it is be acquired, but with the implication that it—domesticity through landownership and homesteading—is necessary for a believable romantic ending.

After Rafe has succeeded in his quest for vengeance against the men who murdered his family and left him for dead, he returns to Charity’s homestead to marry her and finish cultivating the land. Christal clears her name of the murder she’d been committed for, leaves her wealthy family, and returns West with Cain. Lily leaves the outlaw gang behind after a disastrous train robbery nearly gets the entire gang killed, and after living in Mexico for a year, returns to Texas and Jocelyn to fulfill their mutual dreams of settling down and running a farm (in this novel, their outlaw habits die hard—they plan to rustle cattle to start their ranch).

Unlike James Fenimore Cooper, who struggled to make Natty Bumppo into a hero of a romance, Western historical romance novelists of the 20th and 21st century do not necessarily work hard to place the white Indian/Hawkeye/hunter character in a romantic narrative. It could be the distance of time—1870 is far from 1997, and especially far from 2015, when compared to Cooper writing about the 1750s in the 1820s.Or, as I believe, it is the changing role and experiences of women that plays a part with this ease. Contrasting the Michael Mann adaptation of The Last of the Mohicans (1992) to the 1936 version reveals that the increasing agency the heroine (Cora Munro) and the audience’s changing perception of women on the frontier, makes Hawkeye’s position as a romantic hero easier to write.

The agency of the heroine, and the construction of the hero as open to love and domesticity, turns the frontier into a hybridized space in the Western romance. More recent texts, such as Genevieve Turner’s Las Morenas series, and Beverly Jenkins’s Destiny trilogy, further hybridize the frontier through a multiethnic cast of characters (both series’ take place in turn-of-the-century California, with a Mexican-American family and an African-American/Mexican-American family, respectively), thus increasing agency for marginalized communities and restoring them to their place in the frontier myth.

This isn’t to say there are no problematic elements similar to those seen in Cooper or L’Amour, or in the myths perpetuated by Turner and Buffalo Bill. Similar imagery—covered wagons, dangerous Indians, white women in peril, fears of and the presence of miscegenation (Hawkeye’s constant declaration of being a “man without a cross” and the futility of the pairing of Uncas and Cora), etc, are passed down through time and disseminated across many Western romances. However, the adherence to a hybridized space in the West purposefully molds this imagery and the myth of the frontier to create a satisfying romantic ending that often pulls the protagonists out of an historical reality to formulate its own myth about the West.

In the hands of women writers, the West is where Hawkeye type characters are allowed a domestic life, whether they be female or male. In most—if not all—Western romances, the fugitive from civilization is the most acceptable romance protagonist of all. “Hawkeye” redeems and is redeemed through love and romance, and s/he actively yearns for domesticity. For women, the frontier myth is not masculine and white/European. Women and ethnic groups are permitted to undergo the transformation into “true Americans,” while preserving the hybridization that allows them to escape the “urban wormdom [that] seemed the inevitable destiny of most Americans.” (White) It also isn’t restricted to male/female romantic relationships, as seen in Chance’s novel. Ultimately, freedom, independence, and autonomy, as conceived by women writers in Western romance, is not built solely through the experiences on the frontier, but built through love.

Works Cited

Chance, Megan. Fall From Grace. New York: Harper, 1997. Print.
Krentz, Jayne Ann, ed. Dangerous Men and Adventurous Women: Romance Writers on the Appeal of the Romance. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1992. Print
McKinney, Meagan. Fair Is The Rose. New York: Island Books, 1993. Print.
Ramsdell, Kristin. Romance Fiction: A Guide to the Genre. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2012. Print.
“Romance Industry Statistics.” Romance Writers of America. RWA. 2014. Web. 13 June 2015.
Smith, Henry Nash. Virgin Land: The American West as Symbol and Myth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007. Print.
Sutcliffe, Katherine. Jezebel. New York: Jove, 1997. Print.
Wendell, Sarah and Candy Tan. Beyond Heaving Bosoms: The Smart Bitches Guide to Romance Novels. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2009. Print.
White, Richard. “Frederick Jackson Turner and Buffalo Bill”

September 19th, 2013

Historical Romance Week: Genevieve Turner – Why Historical Romance?

Historical Romance Week

 

Why historical romance?

If you were to go to the museum devoted to the life and discoveries of Marie Curie, you’d learn that her cookbook is kept in a lead box.

“Well,” you might think to yourself, “that makes sense. It is an artifact of her life and should be preserved from the elements. For posterity.”

But that’s not why it’s locked away.

Geiger counter If you’ve ever worked with radioactivity, you know that it is a pain in the neck, especially the clean up. Biologists usually only work with very weak radioactivity, baby radioactivity, stuff you keep behind plastic shields. Not lead.
But still, even baby radioactivity needs to be handled properly, and as you’re cleaning up your bench space after a radioactive experiment, you run the Geiger counter over it to ensure nothing got overlooked. The counter is on the lowest setting, because this is just baby radioactivity. You wave the wand, hearing the tick of cosmic rays hitting every few seconds, the tick-tick-tick of a universe inching towards its heat death, a universe that does not care if you’ve properly cleaned up your radioactivity.

Then the counter picks up something, chattering like an angry squirrel as you hit a spot that you missed, an unseen hot spot. And while the universe may not care if you’ve properly cleaned up your radioactivity, the safety officer will. So you grab some towels and some radiacwash and start scrubbing, being careful to put everything in the radioactive waste.

But even baby radioactivity can be dangerous.

You recall the time that the messiest person in lab, the person most likely to splatter things everywhere and just leave them—that person announces he’s going to do some radioactive work.

And your heart stops.

Because you’re pregnant. And it’s too early to tell anyone, and you never want to tell your adviser, because this will be one more mark in your failure column, right next to the other pregnancy, and while one child is tolerable, two is unacceptable.

But it’s your baby, and you find yourself blurting, “You’ll be really careful about cleaning it up, won’t you?” And as he looks at you, you can tell he knows, because why else would you have said that?

It’s only baby radioactivity.

If you took that Geiger counter, put it to the highest setting, and held it to Madame Curie’s recipe book, it would scream.

Pierre and Marie Curie Why historical romance?
Madame Curie was married to Pierre and had two daughters. She also won two (two!) Nobel Prizes for her work discovering radioactivity and radioactive elements—the first person to do so.

When Marie and Pierre met, he had planned to be a life-long bachelor and she planned to leave France and return home to Poland. But as often happens when love enters, plans changed. You can even now see their intertwined handwriting in their experimental notebooks, the intimacy of their personal and scientific partnership laid bare.

If this were a romance novel, this would be where the curtain falls, the reader assured that they will have their happily ever after. But in real life, the universe marches on—it has an appointment with its heat death, you see—and after eleven years of marriage, Pierre is killed in an accident. After his death, Marie feeds his blood-stained clothes to the fire with her own radiation-scarred hands, unable to bear anyone else touching his things.

Why historical romance?
Because it lets me cheat the universe. In my story, there is no accident. Pierre lives to a ripe old age, alongside his Marie, and in the epilogue, the two of them, a little older, but still quite in love, watch proudly as their daughter, Irene, is awarded the Nobel Prize for her own work.

Because while the universe may not care, I do.

Back to Marie’s recipe book, and a time when Pierre was still alive. At the end of the day, Marie would leave the shack in her backyard where she performed her monumental work, a shack she’d converted to a lab because the French authorities wouldn’t give her one—in fact, wouldn’t do so until after she had won her first Nobel.
She would head to the house to prepare dinner, because no matter how many Nobel Prizes you have, everyone still needs to be fed at the end of the day.

Her hands would be coated with her work, with those elements she had discovered, the elements that would win her two Nobel Prizes. The mystery of those elements would be solved by another woman, who would see the credit—and the Nobel Prize—for that discovery given to her male collaborator. The unveiling of that mystery would set in motion the largest scientific effort of the modern age—the Manhattan Project.

Marie Curie At the end of the day, Madame Curie’s hands would settle on her recipe book, those elements leeching into the pages, the elements that are still there to this day, and will be for thousands of years, setting off the Geiger counter with each random decay into an entirely new element.

She would open her cookbook and begin the timeless work of making food for her family, work that has been the purview of women since history began.

Perhaps if you look at Madame Curie’s recipe book, all you see is a piece of trivia, the banal, a bit of the unimportant women’s work she had to do. Nothing that could be compared to the important work she did in that shack.

But put a Geiger counter up to it, and suddenly you see the Atomic Age coming for us all.

Why historical romance?
Because when you take history, even the most mundane history, and loosen the seams just a bit, you can see modernity peeping through, all the things that have made us, all the things that are still shaping us. And you can see love, most especially in the trivial bits—the dinners that were made, the plans that were changed, the lab notebooks that were shared.

Why historical romance?
Because with historical romance, you can see where we’ve been and where we’re going. And you can fall in love along the way.

Biography: Genevieve Turner is an aspiring historical romance writer. In a previous life, she was a scientist studying the genetics of behavior, but is now a stay at home mom studying the intersection of nature and nurture in her own kids. (Hint: Nature is winning!) She lives in beautiful Southern California, where she manages her family and homesteads in an indolent manner. You can find her on the web and on Twitter @GenTurner5.